MCPA-Level-1日本語参考、MCPA-Level-1資格準備

親愛なる受験生の皆様、何かMuleSoftのMCPA-Level-1試験のトレーニング授業に加入したいのですか。実は措置を取ったら一回で試験に合格することができます。Tech4ExamのMuleSoftのMCPA-Level-1試験のトレーニング資料はとても良い選択なんですよ。Tech4Examの仮想ネットワークトレーニングと授業は大量の問題集に含まれていますから、ぜひあなたが気楽に試験に合格することを約束します。

MuleSoft MCPA-Level-1は、MuleSoft認定プラットフォームアーキテクト-レベル1の知識とスキルを示したい個人にとって重要な試験です。試験は、受験者がMuleSoftのプラットフォームアーキテクチャとそのさまざまなコンポーネントの理解をテストするように設計されています。試験に合格することで、受験者がビジネス要件を満たすMuleSoftソリューションを設計および実装する専門知識を証明できます。

>> MCPA-Level-1日本語参考 <<

試験の準備方法-便利なMCPA-Level-1日本語参考試験-更新するMCPA-Level-1資格準備

我々社のMuleSoft　MCPA-Level-1問題集を購入するかどうかと疑問があると、弊社Tech4ExamのMCPA-Level-1問題集のサンプルをしてみるのもいいことです。試用した後、我々のMCPA-Level-1問題集はあなたを試験に順調に合格させると信じられます。なぜと言うのは、我々社の専門家は改革に応じて問題の更新と改善を続けていくのは出発点から勝つからです。

MCPA-LEVEL-1認定は、統合の分野でスキルと知識を検証しようとしている経験豊富なMulesoft開発者、建築家、および技術的なリードに最適です。この認定は、プラットフォームアーキテクチャにおける個人の専門知識を検証する方法を提供するため、Mulesoftの専門家を雇おうとしている組織にとっても有益です。

MuleSoft MCPA-Level-1認定試験は、MuleSoftのAnypoint Platformを使用して統合ソリューションを設計、構築、管理する専門知識を証明したい人々を対象としています。この認定は、統合分野でキャリアアップを図り、MuleSoftテクノロジーの専門知識を認定されたいアーキテクトや開発者を対象としています。試験は、MuleSoftのアーキテクチャ、実装パターン、および統合の設計と管理のためのベストプラクティスなど、さまざまなトピックをカバーしています。

MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect - Level 1 認定 MCPA-Level-1 試験問題 (Q30-Q35):

質問 # 30
An organization uses various cloud-based SaaS systems and multiple on-premises systems. The on-premises systems are an important part of the organization's application network and can only be accessed from within the organization's intranet.
What is the best way to configure and use Anypoint Platform to support integrations with both the cloud-based SaaS systems and on-premises systems?
A) Use CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in an Anypoint VPC managed by Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane

B)Use CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in the shared worker cloud managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane

C)Use an on-premises installation of Mule runtimes that are completely isolated with NO external network access, managed by the Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane

D)Use a combination of Cloud Hub-deployed and manually provisioned on-premises Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform control plane

A. Option B
B. Option D
C. Option C
D. Option A

正解：A

解説：
Use a combination of CloudHub-deployed and manually provisioned on-premises Mule
runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Platform control plane.
*****************************************
Key details to be taken from the given scenario:
>> Organization uses BOTH cloud-based and on-premises systems
>> On-premises systems can only be accessed from within the organization's intranet Let us evaluate the given choices based on above key details:
>> CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes can ONLY be controlled using MuleSoft-hosted control plane. We CANNOT use Private Cloud Edition's control plane to control CloudHub Mule Runtimes. So, option suggesting this is INVALID
>> Using CloudHub-deployed Mule runtimes in the shared worker cloud managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Anypoint Platform is completely IRRELEVANT to given scenario and silly choice. So, option suggesting this is INVALID
>> Using an on-premises installation of Mule runtimes that are completely isolated with NO external network access, managed by the Anypoint Platform Private Cloud Edition control plane would work for On-premises integrations. However, with NO external access, integrations cannot be done to SaaS-based apps. Moreover CloudHub-hosted apps are best-fit for integrating with SaaS-based applications. So, option suggesting this is BEST WAY.
The best way to configure and use Anypoint Platform to support these mixed/hybrid integrations is to use a combination of CloudHub-deployed and manually provisioned on-premises Mule runtimes managed by the MuleSoft-hosted Platform control plane.

質問 # 31
The implementation of a Process API must change.
What is a valid approach that minimizes the impact of this change on API clients?

A. Postpone changes until API consumers acknowledge they are ready to migrate to a new Process API or API version
B. Update the RAML definition of the current Process API and notify API client developers by sending them links to the updated RAML definition
C. Implement required changes to the Process API implementation so that whenever possible, the Process API's RAML definition remains unchanged
D. Implement the Process API changes in a new API implementation, and have the old API implementation return an HTTP status code 301 - Moved Permanently to inform API clients they should be calling the new API implementation

正解：C

解説：
Implement required changes to the Process API implementation so that, whenever possible, the Process API's RAML definition remains unchanged.
*****************************************
Key requirement in the question is:
>> Approach that minimizes the impact of this change on API clients
Based on above:
>> Updating the RAML definition would possibly impact the API clients if the changes require any thing mandatory from client side. So, one should try to avoid doing that until really necessary.
>> Implementing the changes as a completely different API and then redirectly the clients with 3xx status code is really upsetting design and heavily impacts the API clients.
>> Organisations and IT cannot simply postpone the changes required until all API consumers acknowledge they are ready to migrate to a new Process API or API version. This is unrealistic and not possible.
The best way to handle the changes always is to implement required changes to the API implementations so that, whenever possible, the API's RAML definition remains unchanged.

質問 # 32
An API implementation is deployed on a single worker on CloudHub and invoked by external API clients (outside of CloudHub). How can an alert be set up that is guaranteed to trigger AS SOON AS that API implementation stops responding to API invocations?

A. Implement a heartbeat/health check within the API and invoke it from outside the Anypoint Platform and alert when the heartbeat does not respond
B. Configure a "worker not responding" alert in Anypoint Runtime Manager
C. Create an alert for when the API receives no requests within a specified time period
D. Handle API invocation exceptions within the calling API client and raise an alert from that API client when the API Is unavailable

正解：B

解説：
Configure a "Worker not responding" alert in Anypoint Runtime Manager.
*****************************************
>> All the options eventually helps to generate the alert required when the application stops responding.
>> However, handling exceptions within calling API and then raising alert from API client is inappropriate and silly. There could be many API clients invoking the API implementation and it is not ideal to have this setup consistently in all of them. Not a realistic way to do.
>> Implementing a health check/ heartbeat with in the API and calling from outside to detmine the health sounds OK but needs extra setup for it and same time there are very good chances of generating false alarms when there are any intermittent network issues between external tool calling the health check API on API implementation. The API implementation itself may not have any issues but due to some other factors some false alarms may go out.
>> Creating an alert in API Manager when the API receives no requests within a specified time period would actually generate realistic alerts but even here some false alarms may go out when there are genuinely no requests from API clients.
The best and right way to achieve this requirement is to setup an alert on Runtime Manager with a condition
"Worker not responding". This would generate an alert AS SOON AS the workers become unresponsive.

Bottom of Form
Top of Form

質問 # 33
An API implementation is being designed that must invoke an Order API, which is known to repeatedly experience downtime.
For this reason, a fallback API is to be called when the Order API is unavailable.
What approach to designing the invocation of the fallback API provides the best resilience?

A. Redirect client requests through an HTTP 307 Temporary Redirect status code to the fallback API whenever the Order API is unavailable
B. Set an option in the HTTP Requester component that invokes the Order API to instead invoke a fallback API whenever an HTTP 4xx or 5xx response status code is returned from the Order API
C. Search Anypoint Exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the Order API
D. Create a separate entry for the Order API in API Manager, and then invoke this API as a fallback API if the primary Order API is unavailable

正解：A

質問 # 34
Refer to the exhibit.

What is a valid API in the sense of API-led connectivity and application networks?
A) Java RMI over TCP

B) Java RMI over TCP

C) CORBA over HOP

D) XML over UDP